Views Regarding Multi-Site Ethnography Constantly Being Present in That Location! Perspectives on Multi-Site Ethnography

Abstract

Since the 1980s, the practice of doing research in many locales, referred to as multilocal fieldwork, has gained significant prominence in the discipline of anthropology. This article analyzes the disparities in procedures and underlying assumptions that differentiate modern research techniques from the traditional practice of conducting fieldwork at a single location, which emerged in the mid-1900s. The essay explores the distinctions that exist between qualitative and quantitative research approaches, focusing specifically on their differences. The analysis primarily focuses on investigating the activities of foreign journalists in the news media industry. The data used in this study is derived from multiple field studies conducted by anthropologists associated with Stockholm University. Specifically, the author places much emphasis on analyzing these activities. This study examines the various elements involved in doing fieldwork in multiple locations. The aforementioned components encompass the process of selecting suitable sites, establishing dependable connections with sources in these domains, taking into account the temporal aspects of the fieldwork and the sites themselves, examining the types of data typically gathered in multi-site investigations, assessing the compatibility of fieldwork with professional and organizational environments, and investigating specific research subjects. By further analyzing these features, it is feasible to create subgroups.

Keywords: multi-site ethnography, place, time, field work, observation, job cycle, journalism, and writing to people in other countries